The Penang High Court upheld the conviction of Rosli Mat Zin, 56, a fisherman, and Suhaili Haron, 52, a bus driver, for beating a dog at Kampung Teluk Tempoyak, Batu Maung, Penang on July 8, 2023, at 8:30 pm [1, 2]. Both men were convicted under Section 29(1) of the Animal Welfare Act 2015 based on admissible direct and video evidence [1, 2].
Judge Choong Yeow Choy delivered the judgment on June 6, 2026, affirming the guilt but reducing the penalties. The court lowered the fine from RM50,000 to RM30,000 for each appellant and reduced the default imprisonment from 12 months to 6 months [1, 2]. The judge said, "This court is of the view that the appropriate sentence in the present case is a fine. Accordingly, a fine of RM30,000 is imposed on each appellant, and in default of payment, six months' imprisonment" [1].
The appellants had argued that only appointed animal welfare officers could investigate offenses under the Animal Welfare Act. The court rejected this, holding that police retain investigative powers under the Criminal Procedure Code and Police Act 1967, which are not excluded by the Animal Welfare Act [1, 2].
Justice Choong emphasized the significance of Section 29(1), stating, "a clear and unequivocal message must be conveyed to the public that Section 29(1) of the Animal Welfare Act 2015 should be taken seriously, as the provision serves not only a punitive function but also an important deterrent and educative purpose in the public interest" [2].
The case dates back to the sessions court conviction reached on July 31, 2025, after a full trial of Rosli and Suhaili [1, 2]. The High Court judgment followed their appeal.
The next step involves compliance with the fines or serving the reduced jail term if payment is not made. The court's ruling sets a clear legal precedent on enforcement powers under the Animal Welfare Act and sentencing for animal abuse in Penang.
